Koolblabla 写了: 昨天, 23:01照样设计?这么简单你怎么不去设计一个?照谁的样?
我说过台积电不重要吗?你得好好证明英伟达怎么个不重要法,尤其是显卡水平跟英伟达没关系,是个人都能设计出相同水平的显卡
你这就是为了犟自己是对的,结果话越说越极端,路越来越窄
我这么说吧,如果华为可以和英伟达一样找台积电代工,不用多久华为芯片就和英伟达一样水平了
版主: who
Koolblabla 写了: 昨天, 23:01照样设计?这么简单你怎么不去设计一个?照谁的样?
我说过台积电不重要吗?你得好好证明英伟达怎么个不重要法,尤其是显卡水平跟英伟达没关系,是个人都能设计出相同水平的显卡
你这就是为了犟自己是对的,结果话越说越极端,路越来越窄
我这么说吧,如果华为可以和英伟达一样找台积电代工,不用多久华为芯片就和英伟达一样水平了
Koolblabla 写了: 昨天, 22:29这都是中文圈老分类了,现在的科技行业体现了甚至决定了制造业水平,他这话题是想说制造业怎么衰落,但问题是像英伟达,AMD这些科技行业直接决定制造出产品的水平本身就是制造的一个环节
我不懂这些行业分类。为了方便交流,上面的内容是根据英文转译来的。下面是 AI 原文答复。
Shepherd's question: Which sector does Apple fall into? The manufacturing industry or else?
AI answer
Apple is not best classified as a manufacturing company, even though it designs products that are manufactured by partners.
The classification depends on the context:
Here's how it compares:
| Classification System | Apple's Category |
|---|---|
| Sector | Information Technology |
| Industry | Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals |
| Business Type | Technology / Consumer Electronics |
| Manufacturing | Outsourced manufacturing (e.g., partners like Foxconn and Pegatron assemble many Apple products) |
Not in the traditional sense. Apple:
So if you're classifying Apple among broad economic sectors, the correct answer is Information Technology, not Manufacturing.